» 遊客:  立即注册 | 登錄 | 幫助

RSS 訂閱當前論壇  
上一主題 下一主題
   
標題: 香港地冇論搞乜總有一堆包拗頸。  
 
Bitcoin8
高級會員
Rank: 4


UID 1365
精華 0
積分 940
帖子 424
閱讀權限 50
註冊 2025-12-4
香港地冇論搞乜總有一堆包拗頸。

Letters | Hong Kong’s regulation of fintech must not stifle innovation
As an international financial centre, Hong Kong has a world-class financial sector, but it has only a nascent fintech sector.
As one of the notable outcomes of fintech, virtual assets, including cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, have been gaining ground recently. The government recently gazetted the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Bill 2022, proposing to introduce a licensing regime for virtual asset service providers.
The bill stipulates that all virtual asset service providers should be licensed, and they can only offer services to professional investors. Yet, to qualify as a professional investor, an individual must have a portfolio of not less than HK$8 million.
The government is taking a very conservative approach to virtual assets. It seeks to impose a robust regime regulating virtual assets and their service providers, rather than establishing a virtual asset-friendly environment.
Undeniably, Hong Kong government is obliged to preserve a safe and well-ordered market. It also has a duty to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and guard against the risks that virtual assets may be used for fraud, scams or a method to extort money from naive speculators.
However, regulation and innovation are not mutually exclusive. Other jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, the United States and Switzerland also face money laundering and security issues, but instead of imposing stringent requirements that stifle innovation, they set more favourable and convenient rules for conducting a virtual asset business.
Moreover, retail investors in Hong Kong are likely to continue to trade using overseas exchanges even after the introduction of the new regulations. Therefore, the proposed virtual asset service provider regulatory regime in Hong Kong is unnecessarily rigorous. The government should not regulate at the expense of innovation.
It is hoped that Hong Kong can be strong not only in “fin”, but also in “tech” in the future, and it can carve out a major role in a fintech-enabled future.
Lau Kit-hung, partner, and Dragon Lo Koon-kit, intern, at Robinsons Lawyers
[ 本帖最後由 Bitcoin 於 2022-8-11 08:54 編輯 ]
2022-6-20 16:19:33#1
!view_profile!  發短消息   !report_to_moderator!!top!
   
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即注册

本版積分規則




重要聲明:
本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,論壇對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。
而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷内容之真實性。
於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資/博彩等問题)。
由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。 論壇有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。
切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。嚴禁直接以名稱公開批評任何樣構或人仕,或指名道姓地公開批評任何人仕,機構,公司 干擾或破壞本服務或與本服務相連線之伺服器和網路,破壞正常的對話流程、造成螢幕快速移動,或使本服務其他使用者無法打字,或對其他使用者参加即時交流的能力產生負面影響。

本網站保留一切法律權利。
與廣告商進行之交易
你於本服務或經由本服務與廣告商進行通訊或商業往來,或參與促銷活動,包含相關商品或服務之付款及交付,以及前開交易其他任何相關條款、條件、保证或陳述,完全為你與前開廣告商之間之行為。
前開任何交易或前開廣告商出現於本服務所生之任何性質的損失或損害,你同意論壇不予負責。
请點擊一免直權聲明及重要事项
文章及附件由海燕策略研究論壇會員製作,以共享創意署名-非商業性-禁止衍生3.0通用版 授權條款釋出。
授權條款所屬的司法管轄領域(通用版),上文連接是一份普通人可以理解的法律文本(許可協議全文)的概要。
海燕策略研究論壇©All rights reserved.
本论坛支付平台由支付宝提供
携手打造安全诚信的交易社区   Powered by *海燕策略研究論壇*2006-2025
Processed in 0.060417 second(s), 21 queries .

GMT+8, 2025-12-7 02:59 Archiver|小黑屋|*海燕策略研究論壇*